Bug #2965
closedVersion 5 Beta1 - Multiple NFQUEUE failed
Description
Hi,
On 05/05/19 at 10:35, F.Tremblay wrote:
Hello, can anyone confirm the same problem with multiple NFQUEUE ?
yes I can confirm that, could you create a redmine ticket for that?
Thanks
Working:
suricata -D -q 0 -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -vv
Working:
suricata -D -q 1 -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -vv
Not working:
suricata -D -q 0 -q 1 -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -vv
May 04 16:13:12 debian suricata659: [660] <Info> -- binding this thread 0
to queue '0'
May 04 16:13:12 debian suricata659: [660] <Info> -- setting queue length
to 16384
May 04 16:13:12 debian suricata659: [660] <Info> -- setting nfnl bufsize
to 24576000
May 04 16:13:12 debian suricata659: [661] <Info> -- binding this thread 1
to queue '0'
May 04 16:13:12 debian suricata659: [661] <Error> -- [ERRCODE:
SC_ERR_NFQ_CREATE_QUEUE(72)] - nfq_create_queue failed
May 04 16:13:12 debian suricata659: [661] <Error> -- [ERRCODE:
SC_ERR_NFQ_THREAD_INIT(78)] - nfq thread failed to initializeThanks. Cheers.
F
Updated by Andreas Herz over 5 years ago
- Assignee set to OISF Dev
- Target version set to 70
Updated by Victor Julien over 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Assigned
- Assignee changed from OISF Dev to Alexander Gozman
Alex, can you check this? We're not meant to break backwards compatibility.
Updated by Alexander Gozman over 5 years ago
Victor Julien wrote:
Alex, can you check this? We're not meant to break backwards compatibility.
Ok, I'll look into it in a day or two. I have some ideas about what can go wrong.
Updated by Alexander Gozman over 5 years ago
Updated by Victor Julien over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- Priority changed from High to Normal
- Target version changed from 70 to 5.0rc1