Feature #1216
open
- Subject changed from Debian install outdated - no repo to Debian repository
- Assignee set to Anonymous
- Target version set to TBD
Not sure what the 'outdated' referred to.
- Target version changed from TBD to Packaging/PPA
I guess he means the outdated suricata version included in debian itself.
There is packaging available for both Debian and Ubuntu. The difference is that for Ubuntu we support our own Ubuntu PPA packaging where we make the latest Suricata versions a available right after every release. The Debian repository (for Jessie for example) currently has Suricata 2.0.7 - which is lagging behind.
We can consider adding Debian packaging to provide the latest versions.
Peter Manev wrote:
There is packaging available for both Debian and Ubuntu. The difference is that for Ubuntu we support our own Ubuntu PPA packaging where we make the latest Suricata versions available right after every release. The Debian repository (for Jessie for example) currently has Suricata 2.0.7 - which is lagging behind.
We can consider adding Debian packaging to provide the latest versions.
- Priority changed from Normal to Low
Suricata is kept up to date in Debian Backports as well now.
- Tracker changed from Support to Feature
- Effort set to high
- Difficulty set to low
- Assignee set to Community Ticket
I would like to second this feature request of a Debian repository.
1) At the moment, there are no backports for the current stable release (Buster). And for oldstable (Stretch), the backports are stuck at 4.1.2 as well.
2) Even if the backporting activity would resume, it's only a matter of time until a gap between the maintenance releases and backports arises again. That is, when the freeze period for the next release begins, backports to stable will also be stuck at whatever version was "frozen" for the next Debian release. So. I don't think the backports repository is the best place for a stable and maintained package archive.
Also available in: Atom
PDF