Feature #2644
closedAdd direction of stream to eve-json events
Added by Stian Bergseth about 6 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.
Description
Add a direction field in eve-json to indicate what direction the stream started with.
Updated by Daniel Jaraud about 6 years ago
I confirm, this would be great. It's a problem I'm frequently having trouble with. For now I'm just checking whether flow_id value has been seen before or not, but it's a rather complex and costly way of doing it. It's also causing troubles when I'm looking to graph data coming from eve.json, there's no easy way to know if the connexion is related to a former event or not.
Updated by Daniel Jaraud about 6 years ago
This feature may be related: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/2628 and I think both could be merged.
Updated by Victor Julien about 6 years ago
Some work has been done by Stian, but I think we need a bit more on the QA side to validate that the field is always correct, see: https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/3521#issuecomment-446604186
Help on this would be much appreciated!
Updated by Daniel Jaraud about 6 years ago
Hi Victor,
I'm going to have a serious look at it and will report on my tests.
Thanks a lot for the update.
Updated by Daniel Jaraud about 6 years ago
Hi Victor,
Got the work done by Stian patched on both 3.2 and master branch in production, as well as on brand new installs over the last day.
With libhtp installed and a ./configure --enable-hiredis --prefix=/usr/ --sysconfdir=/etc/ --localstatedir=/var/.
The field is empty only in cas of app_proto failed (flow timeout) or when tcp_state is closed, which seems OK to me.
I tested the master branch with ../suricata-verify-master/run.py > results.log, here is the result:
@
===> alert-testmyids: OK
===> alert-testmyids-not-established: OK
===> dnp3: OK
===> dnp3-dnp3_data-alert: OK
===> dnp3-dnp3_func-alert: OK
===> dns-eve: OK
===> dns-eve-v2-udp-dig-a-www-suricata-ids-org: OK
===> dns-json-log: OK
===> dns-lua-rules: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_LUA
===> dns-single-request: OK
===> dns-tcp-multirequest-buffer-1: OK
===> dns-tcp-ts-gap: OK
===> dns-tcp-www-google-com: OK
===> dns-udp-dig-a-www-suricata-ids-org: OK
===> dns-udp-dns-log-unanswered: OK
===> dns-udp-double-request-response: OK
===> dns-udp-eve-log-aaaa-only: OK
===> dns-udp-eve-log-answer-only: OK
===> dns-udp-eve-log-mx-only: OK
===> dns-udp-eve-log-query-only: OK
===> dns-udp-eve-log-txt: OK
===> dns-udp-nxdomain-soa: OK
===> dns-udp-unsolicited-response: OK
===> dns-udp-z-flag-fp: OK
===> eve-alert-metadata-defaults: OK
===> eve-alert-metadata-enable-rule: OK
===> eve-alert-metadata-off: OK
===> eve-metadata: OK
===> filestore-v2.1-forced: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_NSS
===> filestore-v2.2-forced-with-open-files: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_NSS
===> filestore-v2.3-fserror: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_NSS
===> filestore-v2.4-forced-with-meta: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_NSS
===> filestore-v2.5-both-enabled: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_NSS
===> http-xff-eve-forward-extra-data: OK
===> http-xff-eve-forward-overwrite: OK
===> http-xff-eve-reverse-extra-data: OK
===> http-xff-eve-reverse-overwrite: OK
===> http-xff-unified2: SKIPPED: requires script returned false
===> linktype-228: OK
===> lua-output-dns: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_LUA
===> lua-output-http: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_LUA
===> lua-output-smtp: SKIPPED: requires feature HAVE_LUA
===> output-eve-fileinfo: OK
===> output-pcap-log: OK
===> output-tcp-data: OK
===> proto-mismatch-http-ssh: OK
===> show-help: OK
===> smtp: OK
===> test-config-empty-rule-file: OK
===> tls: OK
===> tls-fingerprint-alert: OK
===> tls-json-output-ids: OK
===> tls-json-output-ips: OK
PASSED: 43
FAILED: 0
SKIPPED: 10
@
So this look fine to me, the feature gives great enhancement for my SIEM, especially for graphs and live maps, as well as for operators quick understanding of flows.
Please let me know if you need more testing.
Updated by Daniel Jaraud about 6 years ago
Feature request #2628 can be closed (fixed by this feature request).
Updated by Victor Julien about 6 years ago
Hi Daniel, what I meant was a new set of tests for suricata-verify to show that the new functionality works correctly in the various scenarios. Unless I'm missing something I don't see that in the output above, correct?
Updated by Victor Julien over 5 years ago
- Related to Feature #2628: Specify the flow direction in metadata sent by Suricata. added
Updated by Victor Julien about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- Assignee deleted (
Stian Bergseth) - Target version deleted (
TBD)
We believe this has been addressed in recent Suricata versions.